[ad_1]
After months of hesitation, the US president announced the end of the Daca program, set up in 2012 by Barack Obama to protect immigrants who arrived very young in the United States. For the first time in his presidency, Donald Trump, rather of the kind to doubt nothing gives the feeling of not taking full responsibility for one of his decisions. In this case, the controversial one of gradually removing the program Deferred Action for Childhood Arrival. The adoption of a six-month migration reform seems very hypothetical, however, both Democrats and Republicans have been struggling on this topic for years. The nickname of the beneficiaries of the DACA, the ‘Dreamers’ refers to the Dream Act, a bill to permanently regulate these young immigrants. Deposited in 2001, he vegetated for many years on the Capitol before falling into oblivion. In June 2012, overwhelmed by the parliamentary impasse, Barack Obama decided to act by decree to provide temporary protection to these young people. In order to benefit from the Daca, young people had to fulfill several conditions: to be at least 15 years old, to have entered the United States before 2007 and before the age of 16, to have a clean criminal record, and to be in school or, for the older ones, have obtained the equivalent of the baccalaureate or have served in the US Army. A small step forward on a delicate subject. The President of the United States, Donald Trump, raised Wednesday, January 24, the possible naturalization of future ‘dreamers’.
First, there are 800,000 who arrived illegally in the United States before the age of 16. They have therefore not generally chosen to live there illegally, but often feel more American than anything else. Since June 2012, they have benefited from the Obama administration’s DACA program, which has temporarily regulated irregular children and young adults under certain conditions. Beneficiaries received a two-year renewable residence permit, which allowed them to work legally. The federal authorities also explicitly stated that these beneficiaries were not evictable during this period. But this status did not entitle him to any future regularization or naturalization. The removal of DACA could result in the expulsion of hundreds of thousands of people who grew up in the United States after clandestinely entering the United States with their parents, sometimes several decades ago. Many of these dreamers now have families and jobs and are well integrated into American society. Once deprived of this legal protection, dreamers will return to a life of secrecy. And will find themselves again under the threat of deportation, even though the Trump administration ensures that the priority remains to expel immigrants sentenced by justice. For months, the president was torn between the two rival factions within the White House. On the one hand, hard-liners urged Donald Trump to keep his promise so as not to undermine his image of extreme firmness. On the other hand, the camp of the moderates tried to convince him to preserve DACA, a program supported by 64% of Americans according to a recent survey by NBC News. The United States Congress, entirely in the hands of the Republicans, was unable in the spring to adopt an immigration reform that could have solved the problem of DACA beneficiaries, with a possible path to naturalization. The courts of first instance have maintained the protection of young people already registered but have banned any new registration. Since then, the US President has had the opportunity to appoint a second Conservative Supreme Court Justice, Brett Kavanaugh, which increases his chances of getting satisfaction on this subject.
Meanwhile, as Donald Trump claims to have contributed to strong economic growth since his arrival at the White House while making hostile remarks about immigrants, economists, and business leaders warn that this policy could have a very negative impact on the economy. With almost full employment, employers are increasingly struggling to recruit employees, particularly in sectors such as construction currently in high demand to rebuild the regions that were devastated by the hurricanes in 2017. The decision to end DACA sparked opposition from business leaders, of whom a hundred signed a petition asking the US Congress to pass a law protecting these young ‘dreamers’. Donald Trump’s immigration policy, like the end of immunizing nearly 200,000 Salvadorans from expulsion from the United States, could cost the US economy by fueling a crisis in the hands of the United States. artwork. Ironically, while Salvadorans may be deported next year, the US government has warned Americans traveling to El Salvador, calling on them to be cautious about gangs, extortion, and violence against drug traffickers. drugs and weapons operating in this Central American country. For Donald Trump, it’s about making a commitment to his campaign. As a candidate, he promised to immediately terminate the DACA program. The businessman believed at the time that it was ‘one of the most unconstitutional actions ever undertaken by a president’. But once elected, the US president seemed to distance himself from this campaign promise. He may have been sensitive to the arguments of some parliamentarians who, including on his side, have expressed reservations about a unilateral White House initiative. This is a direct consequence of the ‘zero tolerance’ policy against clandestine immigration introduced in April by the Trump administration. Under this new policy, any adult arrested after illegally entering the United States must now be prosecuted for a criminal offense. Pending their appearance before a federal judge, who will decide on a possible prison sentence, the defendants are therefore detained. Hence they separated from their children who, under a 1997 court agreement, can not be detained for more than twenty days, even in the company of their parents. The decree signed Wednesday by Trump orders the Minister of Justice to seize the courts to amend the agreement of 1997, nicknamed the ‘Flores settlement’.
In conclusion, the DACA has long been the target of US conservatives, who argue that illegal immigration is causing Americans to lose jobs. For the first concern, the consequences could vary according to this new device. In the worst case, the Dreamers could end up without a work permit from next year and live again in fear of the raids of the immigration services. DACA has long been the target of US conservatives, who argue that illegal immigration is causing Americans to lose jobs. In fact, Donald Trump’s policy is so opaque and disorganized that nobody seems to know if, when, where, and on what conditions a child can find his family. Officially, the federal agencies involved in the process ensure that families can be reunited, either to be deported at the same time or to wait together for consideration of a possible asylum claim. The Daca program is also vigorously defended by a broad coalition that includes the Democratic opposition, some Republicans, and many business and professional leaders. Among these supporters, are Republican House Leader Paul Ryan and Florida Republican Governor Rick Scott. Both men advocate that the program be preserved in one way or another.
#tessayoung #essay #essays #essaywriting #photoessay #tessayoungedit #代写essay #essay代写 #essayhelp #thingsbitchessay #加拿大essay代写 #essayage #essaywritingservice #lombaessay #essayist #photographicessay #collegeessay #essayer #essayons #tessayoungafter #essaycompetition #risolessayur #theessay #tessayoungedits #essaytime #eyessayitall #englishessay #essaywriter #personalessay #odessayoga #bessay #princessayeshatakia #essayages #collegeessays #essayssuck #essaywritinghelp #videoessay #lombaessaynasional #essaytips
